| |
Caret
Commercial
Applications
Research for
Extraterrestrial
Technology
The Story begins
here and
here. (as time passes, the
story has been pushed into the archives of each site so some
searching might be in order.
There are more up
to date postings on the subject here:
http://digitalseance.wordpress.com/2007/06/
I felt that this
information was true enough and correct based on my own experiences.
This is an excellent example of the type of technology that we
should have access to but apparently do not.
This information
was recently made available and I am posting it here to ensure that
it gets broader press and especially since this is a good focal
point along the lines of the EHD research that falls along the lines
of this information.
I have more than
further comments however for the moment I am short on time so I'll
just introduce this material as it speaks to me.
My Follow up:
Breakdown of Caret
Information
1. Our
written languages tend to suffer from disparity even where disparity
is not.
This language that
is talked about in these files appears to be a language without
disparity. Often the best we have to offer sounds like a
contradiction but only because the language we use to communicate
fails to capture the thing itself. This 'alien, or extra
terrestrial' language appears to describe the fundamentals of
physics literally and by doing so avoids the disparity of the
languages that we are familiar with.
2. I
have spent many years working from within learning and developing
just such an understanding of the physical universe, matter and
energy and from what I have managed to develop to this day gives me
a capacity to have some idea of what is being described in these
papers and photos. I shall definitely have more to present
along these lines when I have the chance to take on the challenge as
I do have very deep renderings and realizations to offer that can be
used now to assist humanity in the evolutionary process.
(Technology, human evolution? Yes it will express this
relationship in point #3.)
I have spent over
20 years of my life developing what understanding I do have, though
not complete such as the material that is presented I have a limited
understanding of the way that this technology is put together and
how it works.
All I can offer to
back this up for the moment is the parent web address:
http://Metosphericplasmaproducts.com
The name Metosphere
is actually a geometric calculation tool used to help relate 3 space
to the energetic functions we currently relate to only as misnomers,
(IE. Electrons were never particles, a point charge is not the total
energy between dipoles, etc...)
The key is the
electron, understand what the electron is, how it relates to light,
inertia, gravity and the magnetic field and you can re-write how
mater, energy and time function within our universe/s. What is
angular momentum? What is spin?
The electron is a
program that can be altered to fabricate any form or function
desired. Don't believe me, check out this information and
start asking yourself these questions:
I. How was this device and components constructed.
II. What is the purpose behind various construction details,
why were certain aspects designed a certain way? For function
or for artistic or fabrication requirements, in a factory, in a box
with a fox?
III. Given the claimed open ended nature of the materials for
computational capacity what then is the simple driving function that
powers this devices ability to lock objects into a pre-arranged
static space function?
3.
Power and Understanding are lacking in this world and primarily
because our languages tend to fall short of the simplicity that is
truly our reality. Disparity once again, power, understanding,
cooperation are just words to us. We are still learning (and
in some cases not) what these mere words represent with the hope
that we may manifest a greater reality behind these words.
That is what
this is all about although, this information does tend to focus on the technology
aspect.
What you need to understand as I understand is this:
~When our science is
the understanding of nature then technology is no longer the domain
of the scientific but of the living. (everyone)
~Disparity and caste
are no longer a threat to cooperation as we presently know it, not
in the world/s that this language is/was used.
Not just some
language that evolved and a group of beings decided that this
specific mathematic language in the form of geometry would allow
everyone to communicate but that the actual nature of the universe
itself could be used as a universal language that was already
available and used by all those who had gone beyond mere 'alien'
races and became one of the universal race of living understanding
extra-terrestrials.
Like I said, our
language is rife with disparity so consider these points as you
examine this fascinating and rare look into information that should
have been available to us a long long time ago.
That is why this
information is so important if not for the simple fact that we are
about to take our first steps into a greater universe of
understanding as a world identity, as terrans.
The original source
for this material :
http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/
|
|
| |
Explanation of the Recent "Strange
Craft" Sightings
    
Here is the breif introduction. I'm using the alias Isaac, and
used to work in what was called the CARET program in the 80's.
During my time there, I worked with a lot of the technology that is
clearly at work in the recent drone/strange craft sightings, most
notably the "language" and diagrams seen on the underside of each
craft. What follows is a lengthy letter about who I am, what I know,
and what these sightings are (probably) all about.
The appearance of these photos has convinced me to release at least
some of the numerous photographs and photocopied documents I still
possess some 20 years later that can explain a great deal about
these sightings. On this site you will find some of these. They are
available as high resolution scans that I am giving away free,
PROVIDED THEY ARE NOT MODIFIED IN ANY WAY AND ARE KEPT TOGETHER
ALONG WITH THIS WRITTEN MATERIAL.
I am also trying to get in touch with the witnesses so far, such as
Chad, Rajman, Jenna, Ty, and the Lake Tahoe witness (especially
Chad). I have advice for them that may be somewhat helpful in
dealing with what they've seen and what I would recommend they do
with what they know. If you are one of these witnesses, or can put
me in touch with them, please contact Coast to Coast AM and let them
know.
My Experience with the CARET Program and Extra-terrestrial
Technology
Isaac, June 2007
This letter is part of a package I've assembled for Coast to Coast
AM to distribute to its audience. It is a companion to numerous
document and photo scans and should not be separated from them.
You can call me Isaac, an alias I've chosen as a simple measure of
protection while I release what would be called tremendously
sensitive information even by todays standards. “Sensitive” is not
necessarily synonymous with “dangerous”, though, which is why my
conscience is clear as I offer this material up for the public. My
government has its reasons for its continual secrecy, and I
sympathize with many of them, but the truth is that I'm getting old
and I'm not interested in meeting my maker one day with any more
baggage than necessary! Furthermore, I put a little more faith in
humanity than my former bosses do, and I think that a release of at
least some of this info could help a lot more than it could hurt,
especially in today's world.
I should be clear before I begin, as a final note: I am not
interested in making myself vulnerable to the consequences of
betraying the trust of my superiors and will not divulge any
personal information that could determine my identity. However my
intent is not to deceive, so information that I think is too risky
to share will be simply left out rather than obfuscated in some way
(aside from my alias, which I freely admit is not my real name). I
would estimate that with the information contained in this letter, I
could be narrowed down to one of maybe 30-50 people at best, so I
feel reasonably secure.
Some Explanation for the Recent Sightings
For many years I've occasionally considered the release of at least
some of the material I possess, but the recent wave of photos and
sightings has prompted me to cut to the chase and do so now.
I should first be clear that I'm not directly familiar with any of
the crafts seen in the photos in their entirety. I've never seen
them in a hangar or worked on them myself or seen aliens zipping
around in them. However, I have worked with and seen many of the
parts visible in these crafts, some of which can be seen in the
Q3-85 Inventory Review scan found at the top of this page. More
importantly though, I'm very familiar with the “language” on their
undersides seen clearly in photos by Chad and Rajman, and in another
form in the Big Basin photos.
One question I can answer for sure is why they're suddenly here.
These crafts have probably existed in their current form for
decades, and I can say for sure that the technology behind them has
existed for decades before that. The “language”, in fact, (I'll
explain shortly why I keep putting that in quotes) was the subject
of my work in years past. I'll cover that as well.
The reason they're suddenly visible, however, is another matter
entirely. These crafts, assuming they're anything like the hardware
I worked with in the 80's (assuming they're better, in fact), are
equipped with technology that enables invisibility. That ability can
be controlled both on board the craft, and remotely. However, what's
important in this case is that this invisibility can also be
disrupted by other technology. Think of it like radar jamming. I
would bet my life savings (since I know this has happened before)
that these craft are becoming visible and then returning to
invisibility arbitrarily, probably unintentionally, and undoubtedly
for only short periods, due to the activity of a kind of disrupting
technology being set off elsewhere, but nearby. I'm especially sure
of this in the case of the Big Basin sightings, were the witnesses
themselves reported seeing the craft just appear and disappear. This
is especially likely because of the way the witness described one of
the appearances being only a momentary flicker, which is consistent
with the unintentional, intermittent triggering of such a device.
It's no surprise that these sightings are all taking place in
California, and especially the Saratoga/South Bay area. Not far from
Saratoga is Mountain View/Sunnyvale, home to Moffett Field and the
NASA Ames Research center. Again, I'd be willing to bet just about
anything that the device capable of hijacking the cloaking of these
nearby craft was inadvertently triggered, probably during some kind
of experiment, at the exact moment they were being seen. Miles away,
in Big Basin, the witnesses were in the right place at the right
time and saw the results of this disruption with their own eyes. God
knows what else was suddenly appearing in the skies at that moment,
and who else may have seen it. I've had some direct contact with
this device, or at least a device capable of the same thing, and
this kind of mistake is not unprecedented. I am personally aware of
at least one other incident in which this kind of technology was
accidentally set off, resulting in the sudden visibility of normally
invisible things. The only difference is that these days, cameras
are a lot more common!
The technology itself isn't ours, or at least it wasn't in the 80's.
Much like the technology in these crafts themselves, the device
capable of remotely hijacking a vehicle's clacking comes from a
non-human source too. Why we were given this technology has never
been clear to me, but it's responsible for a lot. Our having access
to this kind of device, along with our occasionally haphazard
experimentation on them, has lead to everything from cloaking
malfunctions like this to full-blown crashes. I can assure you that
most (and in my opinion all) incidents of UFO crashes or that kind
of thing had more to do with our meddling with extremely powerful
technology at an inopportune time than it did mechanical failure on
their part. Trust me, those things don't fail unless something even
more powerful than them makes them fail (intentionally or not).
Think of it like a stray bullet. You can be hit by one at any time,
without warning, and even the shooter didn't intent to hit you. I
can assure you heads are rolling over this as well. If anyone
notices a brilliant but sloppy physicist patrolling the streets of
Baghdad in the next couple weeks, I'd be willing to guess how he got
there. (I kid, of course, as I certainly hope that hasn't actually
happened in this case)
I'd now like to explain how it is that I know this. |
|
| |
The CARET Program
My story begins the same as it did for many of my co workers, with
graduate and post-graduate work at university in electrical
engineering. And I had always been interested in computer science,
which was a very new field at the time, and my interest piqued with
my first exposure to a Tixo during grad school. In the years
following school I took a scenic route through the tech industry and
worked for the kinds of companies you would expect, until I was
offered a job at the Department of Defense and things took a very
different turn.
My time at the DoD was mostly uneventful but I was there for quite a
while. I apparently proved myself to be reasonably intelligent and
loyal. By 1984 these qualities along with my technical background
made me a likely candidate for a new program they were recruiting
for called “CARET”.
Before I explain what CARET was I should back up a little. By 1984,
Silicon Valley had been a juggernaut of technology for decades. In
the less than 40 years since the appearance of Shockley’s transistor
this part of the world had already produced a multi billion dollar
computer industry and made technological strides that were
unprecedented in other fields, from hypertext and online
collaboration in '68 to the Alto in '73.
Private industry in Silicon Valley was responsible for some of the
most incredible technological leaps in history and this fact did not
go unnoticed by the US government and military. I don’t claim to
have any special knowledge about Roswell or any of the other alleged
early UFO events, but I do know that whatever the exact origin, the
military was hard at work trying to understand and use the
extra-terrestrial artifacts it had in its possession. While there
had been a great deal of progress overall, things were not moving as
quickly as some would have liked. So, in 1984, the CARET program was
created with the aim of harnessing the abilities of private industry
in silicon valley and applying it to the ongoing task of
understanding extra-terrestrial technology.
One of the best examples of the power of the tech sector was Xerox
PARC, a research center in Palo Alto, CA. XPARC was responsible for
some of the major milestones in the history of computing. While I
never had the privilege of working there myself I did know many of
the people who did and I can say that they were among the brightest
engineers I ever knew.
XPARC served as one of the models for the CARET program’s first
incarnation, a facility called the Palo Alto CARET Laboratory (PACL,
lovingly pronounced “packle” during my time there). This was where I
worked, along with numerous other civilians, under the auspices of
military brass who were eager to find out how the tech sector made
so much progress so quickly. My time at the DoD was a major factor
behind why I was chosen, and in fact about 30+ others who were hired
around the same time had also been at the Department about as long,
but this was not the case for everyone. A couple of my co-workers
were plucked right from places like IBM and, at least two of them
came from XPARC itself. My DoD experience did make me more eligable
for positions of management, however, which is how I have so much of
this material in my possession to begin with.
So in other words, civilians like myself who had at--at most--some
decent experience working for the DoD but no actual military
training or involvement, were suddenly finding ourselves in the same
room as highly classified extra-terrestrial technology. Of course
they spent about 2 months briefing us all before we saw or did
anything, and did their best to convince us that if we ever leaked a
single detail about what we were being told, they’d do everything
short of digging up our ancestors and putting a few slugs in them
too just for good measure. It seemed like there was an armed guard
in every corner of every room. I’d worked under some pretty hefty
NDAs in my time but this was so far out of my depth I didn’t think I
was going to last 2 weeks in an environment like that. But amazingly
things got off to a good start. They wanted us, plain and simple,
and our industry had shown itself to be so good at what it did that
they were just about ready to give us carte blanche.
Of course, nothing with the military is ever that simple, and as is
often the case they wanted to have their cake and eat it too. What I
mean by this is that despite their interest in picking our brains
and learning whatever they could from our way of doing things, they
still wanted to do it their way often enough to frustrate us.
At this point I'm going to gloss over the emotional side of this
experience, because this letter isn't intended to be a memoir, but I
will say that there's almost no way to describe the impact this kind
of revelation has on your mind. There are very few moments in life
in which your entire world view is turned forever upside down, but
this was one of them. I still remember that turning point during the
briefing when I realized what he'd just told us, and that I hadn't
heard him wrong, and that it wasn't some kind of joke. In retrospect
the whole thing feels like it was in slow motion, from that slight
pause he took just before the term “extra-terrestrial” came out for
the first time, to the way the room itself seemed to go off kilter
as we collectively tried to grasp what was being said. My reflex
kept jumping back and forth between trying to look at the speaker,
to understand him better, and looking at everyone else around me, to
make sure I wasn't the only one that was hearing this. At the risk
of sounding melodramatic, it's a lot like a child learning his
parents are divorcing. I never experienced that myself, but a very
close friend of mine did when were boys, and he confided in me a
great deal about what the experience felt like. A lot of what he
said would aptly describe what I was feeling in that room. Here was
a trusted authority figure telling you something that you just don't
feel ready for, and putting a burden on your mind that you don't
necessarily want to carry. The moment that first word comes out, all
you can think about it is what it was like only seconds ago, and
knowing that life is never going to be as simple as it was then.
After all that time at the DoD, I thought I at least had some idea
of what was going on in the world, but I'd never heard so much as a
peep about this. Maybe one day I'll write more on this aspect,
because it's the kind of thing I really would like to get off my
chest, but for now I'll digress.
Unlike traditional research in this area, we weren’t working on new
toys for the air force. For numerous reasons, the CARET people
decided to aim its efforts at commercial applications rather than
military ones. They basically wanted us to turn these artifacts into
something they could patent and sell. One of CARET’s most appealing
promises was the revenue generated by these product-ready
technologies, which could be funneled right back into black
projects. Working with a commercial application in mind was also yet
another way to keep us in a familiar mind state. Developing
technology for the military is very different than doing so for the
commercial sector, and not having to worry about the difference was
another way that CARET was very much like private industry.
CARET shined in the way it let us work the way we were used to
working. They wanted to recreate as much of the environment we were
used to as they could without compromising issues like security.
That meant we got free reign to set up our own workflow, internal
management structure, style manuals, documentation, and the like.
They wanted this to look and feel like private industry, not the
military. They knew that was how to get the best work out of us, and
they were right.
But things didn’t go as smoothly when it came to matters like access
to classified information. They were exposing what is probably their
single biggest secret to a group of people who had never even been
through basic training and it was obvious that the gravity of this
decision was never far from their minds. We started the program with
a small set of extra-terrestrial artifacts along with fairly
elaborate briefings on each as well as access to a modest amount of
what research had already been completed. It wasn’t long before we
realized we needed more though, and getting them to provide even the
smallest amount of new material was like pulling teeth. CARET stood
for “Commercial Applications Research for Extra-terrestrial
Technology”, but we often joked that it should have stood for
“Civilians Are Rarely Ever Trusted.”
PACL was located in Palo Alto, but unlike XPARC, it wasn’t at the
end of a long road in the middle of a big complex surrounded by
rolling hills and trees. PACL was hidden in an office complex owned
entirely by the military but made to look like an unassuming tech
company. From the street, all you could see was what appeared to be
a normal parking lot with a gate and a guard booth, and a 1-story
building inside with a fictitious name and logo. What wasn’t visible
from the street was that behind the very first set of doors was
enough armed guards to invade Poland, and 5 additional underground
stories. They wanted to be as close as possible to the kinds of
people they were looking to hire and be able to bring them in with a
minimum of fuss.
Inside, we had everything we needed. State of the art hardware and a
staff of over 200 computer scientists, electrical engineers,
mechanical engineers, physicists and mathematicians. Most of us were
civilians, as I’ve said, but some were military, and a few of them
had been working on this technology already. Of course, you were
never far from the barrel of a machine gun, even inside the labs
themselves (something many of us never got used to), and bi-weekly
tours were made by military brass to ensure that not a single detail
was out of line. Most of us underwent extensive searches on our way
into and out of the building. There it was, probably the biggest
secret in the world, in a bunch of parts spread out on laboratory
tables in the middle of Palo Alto so you can imagine their concern.
One downside to CARET was that it wasn't as well-connected as other
operations undoubtedly were. I never got to see any actual
extra-terrestrials (not even photos), and in fact never even saw one
of their compete vehicles. 99% of what I saw was related to the work
at hand, all of which was conducted within a very narrow context on
individual artifacts only. The remaining 1% came from people I met
through the program, many of which working more closely with “the
good stuff” or had in the past.
In fact, what was especially amusing about the whole affair was the
way that our military management almost tried to act as if the
technology we were essentially reverse engineering wasn't
extra-terrestrial at all. Aside from the word “extra-terrestrial”
itself, we rarely heard any other terms like “alien” or “UFO” or
“outer space” or anything. Those aspects were only mentioned briefly
when absolutely necessary to explain something. In many cases it was
necessary to differentiate between the different races and their
respective technology, and they didn't even use the word “races”.
They were referred to simply as different “sources”.
The Technology
A lot of the technology we worked on was what you would expect,
namely antigravity. Most of the researchers on the staff with
backgrounds in propulsion and rocketry were military men, but the
technology we were dealing with was so out of this world that it
didn’t really matter all that much what your background was because
none of it applied. All we could hope to do was use the vocabulary
of our respective fields as a way to model the extremely bizarre new
concepts we were very slowly beginning to understand as best we
could. A rocket engineer doesn’t usually rub elbows much with a
computer scientist, but inside PACL, we were all equally mystified
and were ready to entertain any and all ideas.
The physicists made the most headway initially because out of all of
our skills, theirs overlapped the most with the concepts behind this
technology (although that isn’t saying much!) Once they got the ball
rolling though, we began to find that many of the concepts found in
computer science were applicable as well, albeit in very vague ways.
While I didn’t do a lot of work with the antigrav hardware myself, I
was occasionally involved in the assessment of how that technology
was meant to interface with its user.
The antigrav was amazing, of course, as were the advances we were
making with materials engineering and so on. But what interested me
most then, and still amazes me most to this day, was something
completely unrelated. In fact, it was this technology that
immediately jumped out at me when I saw the Chad and Rajman photos,
and even moreso in the Big Basin photos.
The “Language”
I put the word Language in quotes because calling what I am about to
describe a “language” is a misnomer, although it is an easy mistake
to make.
Their hardware wasn’t operated in quite the same way as ours. In our
technology, even today, we have a combination of hardware and
software running almost everything on the planet. Software is more
abstract than hardware, but ultimately it needs hardware to run it.
In other words, there’s no way to write a computer program on a
piece of paper, set that piece of paper on a table or something, and
expect it to actually do something. The most powerful code in the
world still doesn’t actually do anything until a piece of hardware
interprets it and translates its commands into actions.
But their technology is different. It really did operate like the
magical piece of paper sitting on a table, in a manner of speaking.
They had something akin to a language, that could quite literally
execute itself, at least in the presence of a very specific type of
field. The language, a term I am still using very loosely, is a
system of symbols (which does admittedly very much resemble a
written language) along with geometric forms and patterns that fit
together to form diagrams that are themselves functional. Once they
are drawn, so to speak, on a suitable surface made of a suitable
material and in the presence of a certain type of field, they
immediately begin performing the desired tasks. It really did seem
like magic to us, even after we began to understand the principles
behind it.
I worked with these symbols more than anything during my time at
PACL, and recognized them the moment I saw them in the photos. They
appear in a very simple form on Chad’s craft, but appear in the more
complex diagram form on the underside of the Big Basin craft as
well. Both are unmistakable, even at the small size of the Big Basin
photos. An example of a diagram in the style of the Big Basin craft
is included with this in a series of scanned pages from the [mistitled]
"Linguistic Analysis Primer". We needed a copy of that diagram to be
utterly precise, and it took about a month for a team of six to copy
that diagram into our drafting program!
Explaining everything I learned about this technology would fill up
several volumes, but I will do my best to explain at least some of
the concepts as long as I am taking the time to write all this down.
First of all, you wouldn't open up their hardware to find a CPU
here, and a data bus there, and some kind of memory over there.
Their hardware appeared to be perfectly solid and consistent in
terms of material from one side to the other. Like a rock or a hunk
of metal. But upon [much] closer inspection, we began to learn that
it was actually one big holographic computational substrate - each
"computational element" (essentially individual particles) can
function independently, but are designed to function together in
tremendously large clusters. I say its holographic because you can
divide it up into the smallest chunks you want and still find a
scaled-down but complete representation of the whole system. They
produce a nonlinear computational output when grouped. So 4 elements
working together is actually more than 4 times more powerful than 1.
Most of the internal "matter" in their crafts (usually everything
but the outermost housing) is actually this substrate and can
contribute to computation at any time and in any state. The shape of
these "chunks" of substrate also had a profound effect on its
functionality, and often served as a "shortcut" to achieve a goal
that might otherwise be more complex.
So back to the language. The language is actually a "functional
blueprint". The forms of the shapes, symbols and arrangements
thereof is itself functional. What makes it all especially difficult
to grasp is that every element of each "diagram" is dependant on and
related to every other element, which means no single detail can be
created, removed or modified independently. Humans like written
language because each element of the language can be understood on
its own, and from this, complex expressions can be built. However,
their "language" is entirely context-sensitive, which means that a
given symbol could mean as little as a 1-bit flag in one context,
or, quite literally, contain the entire human genome or a galaxy
star map in another. The ability for a single, small symbol to
contain, not just represent, tremendous amounts of data is another
counter-intuitive aspect of this concept. We quickly realized that
even working in groups of 10 or more on the simplest of diagrams, we
found it virtually impossible to get anything done. As each new
feature was added, the complexity of the diagram exponentially grew
to unmanageable proportions. For this reason we began to develop
computer-based systems to manage these details and achieved some
success, although again we found that a threshold was quickly
reached beyond which even the supercomputers of the day were unable
to keep up. Word was that the extra-terrestrials could design these
diagrams as quickly and easily as a human programmer could write a
Fortran program. It's humbling to think that even a network of
supercomputers wasn't able to duplicate what they could do in their
own heads. Our entire system of language is based on the idea of
assigning meaning to symbols. Their technology, however, somehow
merges the symbol and the meaning, so a subjective audience is not
needed. You can put whatever meaning you want on the symbols, but
their behavior and functionality will not change, any more than a
transistor will function differently if you give it another name.
Here's an example of how complex the process is. Imagine I ask you
to incrementally add random words to a list such that no two words
use any of the same letters, and you must perform this exercise
entirely in your head, so you can't rely on a computer or even a pen
and paper. If the first in the list was, say, "fox", the second item
excludes all words with the letters F, O and X. If the next word you
choose is "tree", then the third word in the list can't have the
letters F, O, X, T, R, or E in it. As you can imagine, coming up
with even a third word might start to get just a bit tricky,
especially since you can't easily visualize the excluded letters by
writing down the words. By the time you get to the fourth, fifth and
sixth words, the problem has spiraled out of control. Now imagine
trying to add the billionth word to the list (imagine also that
we're working with an infinite alphabet so you don't run out of
letters) and you can imagine how difficult it is for even a computer
to keep up. Needless to say, writing this kind of thing "by hand" is
orders of magnitude beyond the capabilities of the brain.
My background lent itself well to this kind of work though. I'd
spent years writing code and designing both analog and digital
circuits, a process that at least visually resembled these diagrams
in some way. I also had a personal affinity for combinatorics, which
served me well as I helped with the design of software running on
supercomputers that could juggle the often trillions of rules
necessary to create a valid diagram of any reasonable complexity.
This overlapped quite a bit with compiler theory as well, a subject
I always found fascinating, and in particular compiler optimization,
a field that wasn't half of what it is today back then. A running
joke among the linguistics team was that Big-O notation couldn't
adequately describe the scale of the task, so we'd substitute other
words for "big". By the time I left I remember the consensus was
"Astronomical-O" finally did it justice.
Like I said, I could go on for hours about this subject, and would
love to write at least an introductory book on the subject if it
wasn't still completely classified, but that's not the point of this
letter so I'll try to get back on track.
The last thing I'd like to discuss is how I got copies of this
material, what else I have in my possession, and what I plan to do
with it in the future.
My Collection
I worked at PACL from 1984 to 1987, by which time I was utterly
burned out. The sheer volume of details to keep in mind while
working with the diagrams was enough to challenge anyone's sanity,
and I was really at the end of my rope with the military's attitude
towards our “need to know”. Our ability to get work done was
constantly hampered by their reluctance to provide us with the
necessary information, and I was tired of bureaucracy getting in the
way of research and development. I left somewhere in the middle of a
3-month bell curve in which about a quarter of the entire PACL staff
left for similar reasons.
I was also starting to disagree with the direction the leadership
wanted to take as far as the subject of extra-terrestrials went. I
always felt that at least some form of disclosure would be
beneficial, but as a lowly CARET engineer I wasn't exactly in the
position to call shots. The truth is, our management didn't even
want us discussing non-technical aspects of this subject (such as
ethical or philosophical issues), even among ourselves, as they felt
it was enough of a breach of security to let civilians like us
anywhere near this kind of thing in the first place.
So, about 3 months before I resigned (which was about 8 months
before I was really out, since you don't just walk out of a job like
that with a 2 week notice). I decided to start taking advantage of
my position. As I mentioned earlier, my DoD experience got me into
an internal management role sooner than some of my colleagues, and
after about a year of that kind of status, the outgoing searches
each night became slightly less rigorous. Normally, we were to empty
out any containers, bags or briefcases, then remove our shirt and
shoes and submit to a kind of frisking. Work was never allowed to go
home with you, no matter who you were. For me, though, the briefcase
search was eventually enough.
Even before I actually decided to do it, I was sure that I would be
able to sneak certain materials out with me. I wanted to do this
because I knew the day would come when I would want to write
something like this, and I knew I'd regret it until the day I died
if I didn't at least leave the possibility open to do so. So I
started photocopying documents and reports by the dozen. I'd then
put the papers under my shirt around my lower back, tucked enough
into my belt to ensure they wouldn't fall out. I could do this in
any one of a few short, windowless hallways on some of the lower
floors, which were among the few places that didn't have an armged
guard watching my every move. I'd walk in one end with a stack of
papers large enough that when I came out the other end with some of
them in my shirt, there wouldn't be a visible difference in what I
was holding. You absolutely cannot be too careful if you're going to
pull a stunt like this. As long as I walked carefully they wouldn't
make a crinkling noise. In fact, the more papers I took, the less
noise they made, since they weren't as flimsy that way. I'd often
take upwards of 10-20 pages at once. By the time I was done, I'd
made out with hundreds of photocopies, as well as a few originals
and a large collection of original photographs.
With this initial letter I have attached high resolution scans of
the following:
1. A page from an inventory review with a photo that appears to
depict one of the parts found in the Rajman sighting and parts very
similar to the Big Basin craft
2. The first 9 pages of one of our quarterly research reports
3. Scans of the original photographs used in that report, since
the photocopies obscure most of the details
4. 5 pages from a report on our ongoing analysis of the
“language” (inappropriately titled “linguistic analysis”), depicting
the kind of diagram just barely visible on the underside of the Big
Basin craft
This material is the most relevant and explanatory I could find on
short notice. Now that these are up, IF I decide to release more in
the future, I'll be able to take my time and better search this
rather large collection of mine that I've sadly never organized. I'm
not sure what I'll be doing with the rest of the collection in the
future. I suppose I'll wait and see how this all plays out, and then
play it by ear. There are certainly risks involved in what I'm
doing, and if I were to actually be identified and caught, there
could be rather serious consequences. However, I've taken the proper
steps to ensure a reasonable level of anonymity and am quite secure
in the fact that the information I've so far provided is by no means
unique among many of the CARET participants.
Besides, part of me has always suspected that the government relies
on the occasional leak like this, and actually wants them to happen,
because it contributes to a steady, slow-paced path towards
revealing the truth of this matter.
Since Leaving CARET
Like I said, I left PACL in '87, but have kept in touch with a great
many of my friends and coworkers from those days. Most of us are
retired by now, except of course for those of us that went on to get
teaching jobs, but a few of us still hear things through the
grapevine.
As for CARET itself, I'm not sure what's become of it. Whether it's
still known by the same name, I'm quite sure it's still active in
some capacity, although who knows where. I heard from a number of
people that PACL closed up shop a few years after I left, but I've
still yet to get a clear answer on why exactly that happened. But
I'm sure the kind of work we did there is still going strong. I've
heard from a lot of friends that there are multiple sites like PACL
in Sunnyvale and Mountain View, also disguised to look like
unremarkable office space. But this is all second-hand information
so you can make of it what you will.
Around 2002 or so I came across Coast to Coast AM and have been
hooked ever since. I admit, I don't take most of the show's content
as anything more than entertainment, but there have been occasions
when I could be sure a guest was clearly speaking from experience or
a well-informed source. For me, there's just something very surreal
about hearing all this speculation and so-called inside information
about UFOs and the like, but being personally able to verify at
least some of it as being true or false. It's also a nightly
reminder of how hectic things were in those days, which helps me
enjoy my retirement all the more. Knowing I'm not part of that crazy
world anymore really is something I enjoy on a daily basis, as much
as I miss some of it.
Conclusion
What I've shared so far is only a very small portion of what I have,
and what I know. Despite the very sheltered and insulated atmosphere
within CARET, I did ultimately learn a great deal from various
colleagues, and some of what I learned is truly incredible. I'd also
like to say that for what it's worth, during my time there I never
heard anything about invasions, or abductions, or many of the more
frightening topics that often pop up on Coast to Coast AM. That's
not to say that none of it is true, but in my time working alongside
some of the most well-connected people in this field, it never came
up. So at the very least I can say my intent is not to scare anyone.
My view on the extra-terrestrial situation is very much a positive,
albiet still highly secretive one.
One thing I can definitely say is that if they wanted us gone, we
would have been gone a very, very long time ago, and we wouldn't
even have seen it coming. Throw out your ideas about a space war or
anything silly like that. We'd be capable of fighting back against
them about as much as ants could fight back against a stampede of
buffalo. But that's OK. We're the primitive race, they're the
advanced races, and that's just the way it is. The other advanced
races let them live through their primitive years back in their day,
and there's no reason to think it will be any different for us. They
aren't in the market for a new planet, and even if they were, there
are way too many planets out there for them to care about ours
enough to take it by force.
To reiterate my take on the recent sightings, I'd guess that
experimentation done in the last couple months on a device that,
among other things, is capable of interfering with various crafts
onboard invisibility has resulted in a sudden wave of sightings. It
may not explain all of the recent events, but like I said, I'd bet
my life that's exactly what happened at Big Basin at least, and it's
probably related in some way to the Chad, Rajman and Tahoe
sightings. So, despite all the recent fanfare over this, I'd say
this doesn't mean much. Most importantly, they aren't suddenly
“here”. They've been here for a long time, but just happened to turn
unintentionally visible for brief periods recently.
Lastly, there are so many people selling books, and DVDs, and doing
lectures, and all that, that I would like to reiterate the fact that
I am not here to sell anything. The material I'm sharing is free to
distribute provided it's all kept intact and unmodified, and this
letter is included. I tend to question the motives of anyone
charging money for their information, and will assure you that I
will never do such a thing. And in the future, just to cover all the
bases, anyone claiming to be me who's selling a DVD or book is most
certainly not going to be me.
Any future releases from me will come from the email address I've
used to contact Coast to Coast AM, and will be sent to them only.
I'd like to make this clear as well to ensure that people can be
sure that any future information comes from the same source,
although I must be clear: at this time I do not have any future
plans for additional information. Time will tell how long I will
maintain this policy, but do not expect anything soon. I'd really
like to let this information “settle” for a while and see how it
goes. If I find out I'm getting an IRS audit tomorrow, then maybe
this wasn't too smart. Until then, I'm going to take it slow. I hope
this information has been helpful.
|
|
